1. Dialectic
of Enlightenment
a. What is "Enlightenment"?
Enlightenment had the aim to
overrun fantasy and myths with knowledge. Enlightenment is advanced thoughts,
power and totalitarian. It is knowledge about the world and was used to enlighten
people and change myths and as well liberating people from fear and instead
make them masters. To take away injustice of the old inequality and fear, enlightenment
relates all things that exist to all other things.
b. What is "dialectic"?
Dialectic is the art of
investigating and discussing the truth of opinions. Since knowledge is
perception, one has to investigate which experience is the most truthful, but
also investigate all opinions that are not.
c. What is "nominalism" and why is it an important concept in
the text?
Nominalism is a way of thinking
regarding physical things and abstract things. The physical things or objects exist
and the abstract things do not. It preserves what we can see and is not questioning
it. It also destroys myths which make it a bit easier for people to understand the
world. It is important in the text because it is explained both to be good
(enlightenment) and also to be a bad thing (not questioning the society and if
things are right/wrong).
d. What is the meaning and function of "myth" in Adorno and
Horkheimer's argument?
2. "The
Work of Art in the Age of Technical Reproductively"
a. In the beginning of the essay, Benjamin talks about the relation
between "superstructure" and "substructure" in the
capitalist order of production. What do the concepts "superstructure"
and "substructure" means in this context and what is the point of
analyzing cultural production from a Marxist perspective?
Superstructure is an ideology production
of culture and religion (like concepts and laws etc.). This structure changes
more slowly. Substructure is the general production of economy and politics. It
defines the society and the future. The point of analyzing those two structures
is that they depend on each other and how people behave.
b. Does culture have revolutionary potentials (according to Benjamin)?
If so, describe these potentials. Does Benjamin's perspective differ from the
perspective of Adorno & Horkheimer in this regard?
Yes culture has revolutionary
potentials. He thinks for example that photography can change the society in a
revolutionary way. The perspective of Adorno & Horkheimer differs a bit because
they think that technology has revolutionary potentials rather than cultural
ways.
c. Benjamin discusses how people perceive the world through the senses
and argues that this perception can be both naturally and historically
determined. What does this mean? Give some examples of historically determined
perception (from Benjamin's essay and/or other contexts).
It means that this perception can
be affected by historical phenomena that people have experienced or only
naturally that it is shown. The perception is determined not only by how things
are seen but also what historical things have happened in people’s lives. An example
he brings up is the roman art and how people got new and changed ways of seeing
art.
d. What does Benjamin mean by the term "aura"? Are there
different kinds of aura in natural objects compared to art objects?
By aura Benjamin means the unique
part of objects in the moment. Natural objects have shadows, reflections and
other things because of distance and space creating an aura. While art objects
like pictures differ from natural objects because they can’t have the same aura,
they are not unique anymore since they are reproduced.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar